Gustavo Resende
Johnnatan Messias
Fabrício Benevenuto
ABSTRACT
In Brazil, 48% of the population use WhatsApp to share and discuss news. Currently, there are serious concerns that this platform can become a fertile ground for groups interested in disseminating misinformation, especially as part of articulated political campaigns. Particularly, WhatsApp provides an important space for users to engage in public conversations that worth attention, the public groups. These groups are suitable for political activism and social movement organization. Additionally, it is reasonable to assume that a malicious misinformation campaign might attempt to maximize the audience of a fake story by sharing it in existing public groups. In this paper, we present a system for gathering, analyzing and visualize public groups in WhatsApp. In addition to describe our methodology, we also provide a brief characterization of the content shared in 127 Brazilian groups. We hope our system can help journalists and researchers to understand the repercussion of events related to the Brazilian elections within these groups.
- Alessandro Bessi and Emilio Ferrara. 2016. Social bots distort the 2016 US Presidential election online discussion. First Monday 21, 11 (2016).Google Scholar
- BBC Brasil. 2018. Como o WhatsApp mobilizou caminhoneiros, driblou governo e pode impactar eleições. https://www.bbc.com/portuguese/brasil-44325458. Acessado; 09/08/2018.Google Scholar
- Josemar Caetano, Jaqueline de Oliveira, Helder Lima, Humberto Marques-Neto, Gabriel Magno, Wagner Meira Jr, and Virgílio Almeida. 2018. Analyzing and characterizing political discussions in WhatsApp public groups. arXiv preprint arXiv:1804.00397 (2018).Google Scholar
- Josh Constine. 2018. WhatsApp Hits 1.5 billions monthly users. https://techcrunch.com/2018/01/31/whatsapp-hits-1-5-billion-monthly-users-19b-not-so-bad/ {Acessado em 31/01/2018}.Google Scholar
- Kiran Garimella and Gareth Tyson. 2018. WhatsApp, Doc? A First Look at WhatsApp Public Group Data. In Proc. of the ICWSM.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Christian Montag, Konrad Blaszkiewicz, Rayna Sariyska, Bernd Lachmann, Ionut Andone, Boris Trendafilov, Mark Eibes, and Alexander Markowetz. 2015. Smartphone usage in the 21st century: who is active on WhatsApp? BMC research notes 8, 1 (2015), 331.Google Scholar
- Andrés Moreno, Philip Garrison, and Karthik Bhat. 2017. WhatsApp for Monitoring and Response during Critical Events: Aggie in the Ghana 2016 Election. In ISCRAM.Google Scholar
- Avi Rosenfeld, Sigal Sina, David Sarne, Or Avidov, and Sarit Kraus. 2018. WhatsApp Usage Patterns and Prediction Models. (2018).Google Scholar
- BBC World. 2018. India 'WhatsApp child abduction rumours'. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-44678674. Acessado em 09/08/2018.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- A System for Monitoring Public Political Groups in WhatsApp
Recommendations
A Study of Misinformation in WhatsApp groups with a focus on the Brazilian Presidential Elections.
WWW '19: Companion Proceedings of The 2019 World Wide Web ConferenceThere are rising concerns over the spread of misinformation in WhatsApp groups and the potential impact on political polarization, hindrance of public debate and fostering acts of political violence. As social media use becomes increasingly widespread, ...
Analyzing YouTube Videos Shared on WhatsApp and Telegram Political Public Groups
WebMedia '22: Proceedings of the Brazilian Symposium on Multimedia and the WebAs the use of smartphones in Brazil has advanced in recent years, instant messaging platforms such as WhatsApp and Telegram became part of Brazilians’ lives and communication. However, the use of these platforms is not limited to exchanging messages ...
Analyzing YouTube Videos Shared on Whatsapp in the Early COVID-19 Crisis
WebMedia '20: Proceedings of the Brazilian Symposium on Multimedia and the WebWhatsapp is the most popular messaging app in the world. It is not only used as a one-to-one messaging app but also as a platform for group discussion. Recently, Whatsapp has gained the spotlight for its role in disseminating (often low-quality) ...
Comments