skip to main content
10.1145/3243082.3243098acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswebmediaConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Preparation of Media Object Presentation and Sensory Effect Rendering in Mulsemedia Applications

Published:16 October 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

Nowadays multimedia applications are employed in different fields as entertainment, education, government services, health and e-commerce. Moreover, some applications incorporate sensory effects along with traditional multimedia content, stimulating other human senses beyond sight and hearing to convey information. Those applications are called mulsemedia applications, where the maintenance of synchronization among media objects and sensory effects is a key point for user quality of experience. In order to minimize delays or failures on content reproduction, this paper proposes a new operation on media objects and sensory effects that can be offered to authors of mulsemedia applications. This operation enables the preparation of media object presentation or the preparation of sensory effect rendering, considering device limitations on which the application will be executed. As proof of concept, our proposal is implemented on multimedia applications using the NCL language, through specification of a new NCL event type, named preparation event. Furthermore, a new NCL media property is presented, allowing the control of continuous media reproduction. Finally, three use cases are defined to demonstrate the use of the preparation event in multimedia and mulsemedia applications.

References

  1. Zhong Su, Qiang Yang, and Hong-Jiang Zhang. A prediction system for multimedia pre-fetching in internet. In Proceedings of the eighth ACM international conference on Multimedia, pages 3--11. ACM, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. B. D. Davison. Predicting web actions from html content. In Proceedings of the thirteenth ACM conference on Hypertext and hypermedia, pages 159--168. ACM, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. R. F. Rodrigues and L. F. G. Soares. A framework for prefetching mechanisms in hypermedia presentations. In Multimedia Software Engineering, 2002. Proceedings. Fourth International Symposium on, pages 278--285. IEEE, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. A. M. Figueroa. Pré-busca de conteúdo em apresentações multimídia, Março 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. E. B. Saleme and C. A. S. Santos. Playsem: a platform for rendering mulsemedia compatible with mpeg-v. In Proceedings of the 21st Brazilian Symposium on Multimedia and the Web - WebMedia'15, pages 145--148. ACM, 2015. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. G. Ghinea, C. Timmerer, W. Lin, and S. R. Gulliver. Mulsemedia: State of the art, perspectives, and challenges. ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications, and Applications (TOMM), 11:17, 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. J. Kim, C.G. Lee, Y. Kim, and J. Ryu. Construction of a haptic-enabled broadcasting system based on the mpeg-v standard. Signal Processing: Image Communication, 28(2):151--161, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. M. Waltl, C. Timmerer, and H. Hellwagner. Improving the quality of multimedia experience through sensory effects. In Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX), 2010 Second International Workshop on, pages 124--129. IEEE, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. M. F. de Sousa, R. Kulesza, and C. A. G. Ferraz. A model-driven approach for mulsemedia application domain. In Proceedings of the 22nd Brazilian Symposium on Multimedia and the Web - WebMedia'16, pages 111--118. ACM, 2016. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. M. F. de Sousa, C. A. G. Ferraz, R. Kulesza, I. Ayres, and M. Lima. Mulsemaker: An mdd tool for mulsemedia web application development. In Proceedings of the 23rd Brazillian Symposium on Multimedia and the Web, pages 317--324. ACM, 2017. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. M. Josue, R. Abreu, F. Barreto, D. P. Mattos, G. Amorim, J. A. F. Dos Santos, and D. C. Muchaluat-Saade. Modeling sensory effects as first-class entities in multimedia applications. In ACM Multimedia Systems Conference, 2018, Amsterdam. MMSys 2018, pages 1--12. ACM, 2018. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Z. Yuan, T. Bi, G.M. Muntean, and G. Ghinea. Perceived synchronization of mulsemedia services. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, 17(7):957--966, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. ITU-Recommendation. Nested context language (ncl) and ginga-ncl for iptv services. April 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. W3C. Html audio/video dom currenttime property, 2018. https://www.w3schools.com/tags/av_prop_currenttime.asp.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. L. F. G. Soares, M. F. Moreno, C. S. S. Neto, and M. F. Moreno. Ginga-ncl: declarative middleware for multimedia iptv services. IEEE Communications Magazine, 48(6):74--81, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Britta Meixner and Christoph Einsiedler. Download and cache management for html5 hypervideo players. In Proceedings of the 27th ACM Conference on Hypertext and Social Media, pages 125--136. ACM, 2016. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. W3C. Html5, 2018. https://www.w3schools.com/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. W3C. Media source extensions. w3c recommendation 17 november 2016, 2016. https://www.w3.org/TR/media-source/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Mozilla Firefox. https://www.mozilla.org/pt-br/firefox, 2018.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Google Chrome. https://www.google.com.br/chrome/, 2018.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Internet Explorer. https://www.microsoft.com/pt-br/download/internet-explorer.aspx, 2018.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. D. Fisher et al. Link prefetching faq, {online}, 2014. Disponível em: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Link_prefetching_FAQ.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. K. Yoon. End-to-end framework for 4-d broadcasting based on mpeg-v standard. Signal Processing: Image Communication, 28(2):127--135, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. B. Choi, E.S. Lee, and K. Yoon. Streaming media with sensory effect. In Information Science and Applications (ICISA), 2011 International Conference on, pages 1--6. IEEE, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Information technology -- Media context and control -- Part 3: Sensory information, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Real Time Transport Protocol and User Datagram Protocol. Mpeg-2 ts.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Roberto Ierusalimschy. Programming in lua. R. Ierusalimschy, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. ISO/IEC. Information technology - media context and control - part 6: Common types and tools. Technical report, International Organization for Standardization 23005-6., 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Preparation of Media Object Presentation and Sensory Effect Rendering in Mulsemedia Applications

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      WebMedia '18: Proceedings of the 24th Brazilian Symposium on Multimedia and the Web
      October 2018
      437 pages
      ISBN:9781450358675
      DOI:10.1145/3243082

      Copyright © 2018 ACM

      Publication rights licensed to ACM. ACM acknowledges that this contribution was authored or co-authored by an employee, contractor or affiliate of a national government. As such, the Government retains a nonexclusive, royalty-free right to publish or reproduce this article, or to allow others to do so, for Government purposes only.

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 16 October 2018

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      WebMedia '18 Paper Acceptance Rate37of111submissions,33%Overall Acceptance Rate270of873submissions,31%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader